2005 Chevrolet Colorado vs. 1982 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Colorado is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (175 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chevrolet Colorado weights approximately 188 kg more than 1982 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 1982 Ford Mustang (407 Nm) has 156 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado. (251 Nm). This means 1982 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chevrolet Colorado.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Colorado | 1982 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Colorado | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2769 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 175 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 251 Nm | 407 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 102 mm | 76.2 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1671 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5270 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1660 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3210 mm | 2560 mm |