2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo vs. 2012 Fisker Karma
To start off, 2012 Fisker Karma is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Fisker Karma weights approximately 1025 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 2012 Fisker Karma is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Fisker Karma. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | 2012 Fisker Karma | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Fisker |
| Model | Monte Carlo | Karma |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 181 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1515 kg | 2540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5030 mm | 4996 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1984 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1331 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 3160 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 64 L | 36 L |
