2005 Chevrolet Suburban vs. 2007 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2007 Ford Ranger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chevrolet Suburban. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chevrolet Suburban would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (335 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2007 Ford Ranger. (143 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban should accelerate faster than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Because 2005 Chevrolet Suburban is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2007 Ford Ranger. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chevrolet Suburban (509 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Ford Ranger. (209 Nm). This means 2005 Chevrolet Suburban will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Suburban | 2007 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Suburban | Ranger |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | SUV | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 2399 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 209 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 9.7:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 9 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5580 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1950 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3310 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 140 L | 59 L |