2005 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1963 Volkswagen 1500
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Volkswagen 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Volkswagen 1500 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker (98 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1963 Volkswagen 1500. (52 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1963 Volkswagen 1500.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chevrolet Tracker | 1963 Volkswagen 1500 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volkswagen |
Model | Tracker | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1493 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 98 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2430 mm |