2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2007 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2007 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (335 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2007 Land Rover LR3. (300 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2007 Land Rover LR3.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2007 Land Rover LR3. (427 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2007 Land Rover LR3.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2007 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Land Rover |
Model | 300 | LR3 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2007 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 4393 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 427 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 99.5 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.9 mm | 83 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1900 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.4 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 86 L |