2005 Chrysler Pacifica vs. 2012 Audi TT
To start off, 2012 Audi TT is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Pacifica would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Pacifica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica (251 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 2012 Audi TT. (211 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Pacifica should accelerate faster than 2012 Audi TT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Pacifica weights approximately 598 kg more than 2012 Audi TT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi TT (349 Nm) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica. (339 Nm). This means 2012 Audi TT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Pacifica.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Pacifica | 2012 Audi TT | |
Make | Chrysler | Audi |
Model | Pacifica | TT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Crossover | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3966 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 251 HP | 211 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque | 339 Nm | 349 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2068 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4201 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1700 mm | 1359 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2469 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 10.7 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 87 L | 60 L |