2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, both 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser and 2005 Renault Clio were released in the same year (2005). Therefore the support and the availability on parts for both vehicles should be relatively similar. At 2,945 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (251 HP @ 7150 RPM) has 31 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. (220 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser weights approximately 490 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio.
Because 2005 Renault Clio is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Renault Clio. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser (320 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (300 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler PT Cruiser | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | PT Cruiser | Clio |
Year Released | 2005 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2425 cc | 2945 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 220 HP | 251 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 7150 RPM |
Torque | 320 Nm | 300 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 87 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 82.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.1:1 | 11.4:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1900 kg | 1410 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2590 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 61 L |