2005 Chrysler Sebring vs. 2009 Renault Trafic
To start off, 2009 Renault Trafic is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler Sebring. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler Sebring would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Sebring is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (200 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2009 Renault Trafic. (100 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Sebring should accelerate faster than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Sebring (258 Nm) has 17 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Renault Trafic. (241 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Sebring will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Renault Trafic.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Sebring | 2009 Renault Trafic | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Sebring | Trafic |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 241 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 78 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 9 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1910 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 3100 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 90 L |