2005 Chrysler Voyager vs. 1976 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Voyager is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,092 cc (6 cylinders), 1976 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Ford Falcon (153 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Voyager weights approximately 666 kg more than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Because 1976 Ford Falcon is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Ford Falcon. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Voyager (367 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 42 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Ford Falcon. (325 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2005 Chrysler Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Voyager | 1976 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Voyager | Falcon |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 4092 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 367 Nm | 325 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 99.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2046 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4810 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |