2005 Citroen C3 vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2005 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 1,360 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Citroen C3 (67 HP) has 14 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Citroen C3 weights approximately 447 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1997 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Citroen C3 | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Citroen | MCC |
| Model | C3 | Smart |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1360 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 67 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1097 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1460 mm |
