2005 Daewoo Lanos vs. 1963 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2005 Daewoo Lanos is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 1,349 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Daewoo Lanos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Daewoo Lanos (75 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Lanos should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Seven. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Daewoo Lanos weights approximately 663 kg more than 1963 Lotus Seven. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1963 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1963 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Daewoo Lanos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Daewoo Lanos | 1963 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Daewoo | Lotus |
Model | Lanos | Seven |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1349 cc | 997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 75 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1093 kg | 430 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4080 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 29 L |