2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (330 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1952 Jaguar XK. (158 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1952 Jaguar XK. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1456 kg more than 1952 Jaguar XK. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Jaguar XK. (290 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Ram | XK |
Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 3441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 509 Nm | 290 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 106 mm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2751 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2600 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 63 L |