2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 NSU 1000 C
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 NSU 1000 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 NSU 1000 C would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (346 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 307 more horse power than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (39 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 NSU 1000 C. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1939 kg more than 1963 NSU 1000 C. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 440 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 NSU 1000 C. (69 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 NSU 1000 C.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Dodge Ram | 1963 NSU 1000 C | |
| Make | Dodge | NSU |
| Model | Ram | 1000 C |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5621 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 346 HP | 39 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 509 Nm | 69 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 66.6 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 7.5:1 |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2579 kg | 640 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 3790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1490 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 129 L | 44 L |
