2005 Dodge Ram vs. 1982 Nissan Bluebird
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Bluebird would be higher. At 5,621 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (345 HP) has 264 more horse power than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (81 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1758 kg more than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (509 Nm) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Nissan Bluebird. (121 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Nissan Bluebird.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Dodge Ram | 1982 Nissan Bluebird | |
Make | Dodge | Nissan |
Model | Ram | Bluebird |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5621 cc | 1595 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 81 HP |
Torque | 509 Nm | 121 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2758 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 4360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2050 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2530 mm |