2005 Ford Econoline vs. 1996 Nissan Stagea
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Nissan Stagea. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Nissan Stagea would be higher. At 4,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1996 Nissan Stagea is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Ford Econoline. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Nissan Stagea will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Nissan Stagea (362 Nm) has 24 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econoline. (338 Nm). This means 1996 Nissan Stagea will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econoline.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Econoline | 1996 Nissan Stagea | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | Econoline | Stagea |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Body Type | Van | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4195 cc | 2568 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 338 Nm | 362 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2730 mm |