2005 Ford Econovan vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2005 Ford Econovan is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 3,441 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Jaguar XK is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Jaguar XK (158 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2005 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Econovan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Jaguar XK (290 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Ford Econovan. (138 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1952 Jaguar XK will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Ford Econovan.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Ford Econovan | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Ford | Jaguar |
| Model | Econovan | XK |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1788 cc | 3441 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 138 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1295 kg | 1295 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1640 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2600 mm |
