2005 Ford Mustang vs. 1977 Zastava 1500
To start off, 2005 Ford Mustang is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 4,015 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Mustang (202 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1977 Zastava 1500. (74 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1977 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Mustang weights approximately 457 kg more than 1977 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Mustang (326 Nm) has 213 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Zastava 1500. (113 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Zastava 1500.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Mustang | 1977 Zastava 1500 | |
Make | Ford | Zastava |
Model | Mustang | 1500 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4015 cc | 1480 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 202 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 326 Nm | 113 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1497 kg | 1040 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4050 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2620 mm | 2430 mm |