2005 Ford Ranger vs. 1966 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2005 Ford Ranger is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Ford GT 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Ford GT 40 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 1966 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 2005 Ford Ranger. (104 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 2005 Ford Ranger. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Ranger weights approximately 187 kg more than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Ranger (172 Nm) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Ford GT 40. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Ranger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Ford GT 40.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Ford Ranger | 1966 Ford GT 40 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | Ranger | GT 40 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 2184 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 104 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
Torque | 172 Nm | 85 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1323 kg | 1136 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2990 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 80 L | 125 L |