2005 Ford Thunderbird vs. 1953 Skoda 1200

To start off, 2005 Ford Thunderbird is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Skoda 1200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Skoda 1200 would be higher. At 3,932 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (280 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 245 more horse power than 1953 Skoda 1200. (35 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 1953 Skoda 1200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 702 kg more than 1953 Skoda 1200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Ford Thunderbird (388 Nm) has 314 more torque (in Nm) than 1953 Skoda 1200. (74 Nm). This means 2005 Ford Thunderbird will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1953 Skoda 1200.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Ford Thunderbird 1953 Skoda 1200
Make Ford Skoda
Model Thunderbird 1200
Year Released 2005 1953
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3932 cc 1221 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 280 HP 35 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 388 Nm 74 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1712 kg 1010 kg
Vehicle Length 4740 mm 4510 mm
Vehicle Width 1840 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1330 mm 1660 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2690 mm