2005 GMC Sierra vs. 1982 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2005 GMC Sierra is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 5,965 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 GMC Sierra weights approximately 790 kg more than 1982 Mercury Cougar.
Because 2005 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Mercury Cougar. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 GMC Sierra | 1982 Mercury Cougar | |
Make | GMC | Mercury |
Model | Sierra | Cougar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5965 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 321 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2270 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5790 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3650 mm | 2650 mm |