2005 Holden UTE vs. 1998 Nissan Cefiro
To start off, 2005 Holden UTE is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Nissan Cefiro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Nissan Cefiro would be higher. At 3,789 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Holden UTE weights approximately 66 kg more than 1998 Nissan Cefiro.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Holden UTE | 1998 Nissan Cefiro | |
Make | Holden | Nissan |
Model | UTE | Cefiro |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 3789 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 204 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1434 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5060 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1500 mm |