2005 Jeep Cherokee vs. 1976 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2005 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 2,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 718 kg more than 1976 Nissan 240 C.
Because 2005 Jeep Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Nissan 240 C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Cherokee | 1976 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Jeep | Nissan |
Model | Cherokee | 240 C |
Year Released | 2005 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2499 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1978 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4500 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2700 mm |