2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee vs. 2006 MG ZT
To start off, 2006 MG ZT is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (211 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 24 more horse power than 2006 MG ZT. (187 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2006 MG ZT.
Because 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 MG ZT. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee (319 Nm) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 MG ZT. (245 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee | 2006 MG ZT | |
Make | Jeep | MG |
Model | Grand Cherokee | ZT |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3704 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 211 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 319 Nm | 245 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 93 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 82.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.3:1 |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4750 mm | 4750 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1730 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 13.1 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 78 L | 65 L |