2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 1969 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (191 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 147 more horse power than 1969 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1969 Skoda 1202.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Skoda 1202. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 234 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Skoda 1202. (85 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 1969 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Jeep | Skoda |
| Model | Wrangler | 1202 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1174 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 191 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 85 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 99 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 87 mm | 75 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 30 L |
