2005 Jeep Wrangler vs. 2000 Proton 400
To start off, 2005 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Proton 400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Proton 400 would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (190 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2000 Proton 400. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 2000 Proton 400.
Because 2005 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2000 Proton 400. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Jeep Wrangler (319 Nm) has 211 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Proton 400. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Proton 400.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Jeep Wrangler | 2000 Proton 400 | |
| Make | Jeep | Proton |
| Model | Wrangler | 400 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3966 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 319 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1800 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2510 mm |
