2005 Kia Shuma II vs. 2010 Chevrolet Captiva
To start off, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Kia Shuma II. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Kia Shuma II would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Chevrolet Captiva is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva (135 HP) has 34 more horse power than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (101 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva should accelerate faster than 2005 Kia Shuma II. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Kia Shuma II weights approximately 697 kg more than 2010 Chevrolet Captiva.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Chevrolet Captiva (220 Nm @ 2200 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Kia Shuma II. (148 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2010 Chevrolet Captiva will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Kia Shuma II.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Kia Shuma II | 2010 Chevrolet Captiva | |
Make | Kia | Chevrolet |
Model | Shuma II | Captiva |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1593 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 101 HP | 135 HP |
Torque | 148 Nm | 220 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 2200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1958 kg | 1261 kg |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |