2005 Lancia Lybra vs. 2012 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2012 Holden Commodore is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Lancia Lybra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Lancia Lybra would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 212 more horse power than 2005 Lancia Lybra. (148 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 2005 Lancia Lybra.
Because 2012 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Lancia Lybra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lancia Lybra (309 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 2005 Lancia Lybra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Lancia Lybra | 2012 Holden Commodore | |
| Make | Lancia | Holden |
| Model | Lybra | Commodore |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2387 cc | 5976 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 360 HP |
| Torque | 309 Nm | 290 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.8 L/100km | 14.4 L/100km |
