2005 Land Rover Range Rover vs. 2011 Acura ZDX
To start off, 2011 Acura ZDX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Land Rover Range Rover would be higher. At 4,392 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Acura ZDX (300 HP) has 17 more horse power than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. (283 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Acura ZDX should accelerate faster than 2005 Land Rover Range Rover. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 440 kg more than 2011 Acura ZDX.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Land Rover Range Rover (441 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Acura ZDX. (366 Nm). This means 2005 Land Rover Range Rover will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Acura ZDX.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Land Rover Range Rover | 2011 Acura ZDX | |
Make | Land Rover | Acura |
Model | Range Rover | ZDX |
Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4392 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 283 HP | 300 HP |
Torque | 441 Nm | 366 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2440 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4887 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1994 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1595 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2890 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 14.7 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 19.6 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 100 L | 79 L |