2005 Lincoln LS vs. 1960 MG MGA
To start off, 2005 Lincoln LS is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 MG MGA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 MG MGA would be higher. At 2,964 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Lincoln LS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Lincoln LS (232 HP) has 161 more horse power than 1960 MG MGA. (71 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Lincoln LS should accelerate faster than 1960 MG MGA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Lincoln LS weights approximately 787 kg more than 1960 MG MGA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Lincoln LS (298 Nm) has 194 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 MG MGA. (104 Nm). This means 2005 Lincoln LS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 MG MGA.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Lincoln LS | 1960 MG MGA | |
Make | Lincoln | MG |
Model | LS | MGA |
Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2964 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 232 HP | 71 HP |
Torque | 298 Nm | 104 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4940 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1460 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3020 mm | 2390 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 10.6 L/100km |