2005 Mazda 3 vs. 1975 Zastava 132

To start off, 2005 Mazda 3 is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda 3 (148 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 132. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3 should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 3 weights approximately 128 kg more than 1975 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 3 (183 Nm) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 132. (142 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda 3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 132.

Compare all specifications: