2005 Mazda 6 vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Mazda 6 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda 6 weights approximately 913 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda 6 (323 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 276 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2005 Mazda 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mazda 6 | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Mazda | Seat |
| Model | 6 | 600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 119 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 323 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1488 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4690 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2630 mm | 2010 mm |
