2005 Mazda B3000 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda B3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda B3000 would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Mazda B3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Mazda B3000 (154 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 6. (153 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Mazda B3000 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 6. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Mazda B3000 weights approximately 48 kg more than 2010 Mazda 6. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Mazda B3000 (240 Nm) has 47 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 6. (193 Nm). This means 2005 Mazda B3000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 6.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mazda B3000 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Mazda | Mazda |
Model | B3000 | 6 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2966 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 154 HP | 153 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 193 Nm |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1483 kg | 1435 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4755 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1795 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1720 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2840 mm | 2789 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 70 L |