2005 Mitsubishi Minica vs. 2010 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2010 Ford Mustang is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Minica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Minica would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford Mustang weights approximately 893 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 2005 Mitsubishi Minica is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2010 Ford Mustang. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Minica will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Minica | 2010 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Ford |
| Model | Minica | Mustang |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 657 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 315 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 710 kg | 1603 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3400 mm | 4778 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1480 mm | 1877 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1425 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2720 mm |
