2005 Mitsubishi Nessie vs. 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer
To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer would be higher.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | 2002 Chevrolet TrailBlazer | |
| Make | Mitsubishi | Chevrolet |
| Model | Nessie | TrailBlazer |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2002 |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 269 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 4900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 2880 mm |
