2005 Mitsubishi Nessie vs. 2012 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2012 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mitsubishi Nessie would be higher.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Mitsubishi Nessie | 2012 Toyota Sequoia | |
Make | Mitsubishi | Toyota |
Model | Nessie | Sequoia |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 381 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4610 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1960 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1956 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2790 mm | 3099 mm |