2005 Nissan Pathfinder vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Pathfinder. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Pathfinder would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (270 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2013 Ford E-Series. (222 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder should accelerate faster than 2013 Ford E-Series. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 626 kg more than 2005 Nissan Pathfinder.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Pathfinder (395 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Ford E-Series. (387 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Pathfinder will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Ford E-Series.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Pathfinder | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Nissan | Ford |
| Model | Pathfinder | E-Series |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | SUV | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3950 cc | 4600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 270 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 395 Nm | 387 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 9.38:1 |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1985 kg | 2611 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1850 mm | 2085 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 14.7 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 82 L | 150 L |
