2005 Nissan Terrano vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 2005 Nissan Terrano is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 2,664 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Terrano is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Nissan Terrano (123 HP) has 83 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Terrano should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Terrano weights approximately 610 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Nissan Terrano is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1960 Toyota Master RR. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Nissan Terrano will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Nissan Terrano | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Nissan | Toyota |
| Model | Terrano | Master RR |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2664 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1820 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4250 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1840 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2540 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 75 L |
