2005 Nissan Titan vs. 2010 Audi S8
To start off, 2010 Audi S8 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Titan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Titan would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Titan is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi S8 (450 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Titan. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi S8 should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Titan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Titan weights approximately 1033 kg more than 2010 Audi S8.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Audi S8 (540 Nm) has 26 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Nissan Titan. (514 Nm). This means 2010 Audi S8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Nissan Titan.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Nissan Titan | 2010 Audi S8 | |
Make | Nissan | Audi |
Model | Titan | S8 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Pickup | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5556 cc | 5204 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 305 HP | 450 HP |
Engine RPM | 3600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 514 Nm | 540 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 12.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2208 kg | 1175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5700 mm | 5070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2010 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 12.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 106 L | 90 L |