2005 Peugeot 206 vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Peugeot 206 is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Peugeot 206 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Riley RM A weights approximately 8 kg more than 2005 Peugeot 206.
Because 1951 Riley RM A is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1951 Riley RM A. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 206, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Peugeot 206 | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Peugeot | Riley |
| Model | 206 | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1227 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3840 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2870 mm |
