2005 Renault Clio vs. 1968 Seat 600
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,461 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (96 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1968 Seat 600. (24 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1968 Seat 600. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 460 kg more than 1968 Seat 600. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Renault Clio | 1968 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Renault | Seat |
| Model | Clio | 600 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1461 cc | 767 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 24 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1035 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3780 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2010 mm |
