2005 Renault Clio vs. 2012 Buick LaCrosse
To start off, 2012 Buick LaCrosse is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Buick LaCrosse is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Buick LaCrosse (182 HP) has 108 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Buick LaCrosse should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Buick LaCrosse weights approximately 650 kg more than 2005 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Buick LaCrosse (233 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 2012 Buick LaCrosse will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Renault Clio | 2012 Buick LaCrosse | |
Make | Renault | Buick |
Model | Clio | LaCrosse |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1149 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 182 HP |
Torque | 105 Nm | 233 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4250 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3990 mm | 5001 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1857 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1504 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2837 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 4.7 L/100km | 6.5 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 7.2 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 59 L |