2005 Scion xA vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2005 Scion xA is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,495 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Scion xA is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Scion xA (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Scion xA should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Scion xA weights approximately 296 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Scion xA | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Scion | Zastava |
| Model | xA | 102 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 1302 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 774 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 2160 mm |
