2005 Scion xA vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Scion xA. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Scion xA would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 2005 Scion xA. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 2005 Scion xA. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ford E-Series weights approximately 1760 kg more than 2005 Scion xA. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 Ford E-Series is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ford E-Series. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Scion xA, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Scion xA. (142 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Scion xA. 2013 Ford E-Series has automatic transmission and 2005 Scion xA has manual transmission. 2005 Scion xA will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Ford E-Series will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Scion xA | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Scion | Ford |
| Model | xA | E-Series |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1495 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 142 Nm | 474 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 76 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 90 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 4-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 2830 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3920 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 2111 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2380 mm | 3505 mm |
| Fuel Consumption City | 7.4 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 150 L |
