2005 Suzuki Forenza vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Suzuki Forenza is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Forenza (126 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Forenza should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Suzuki Forenza weights approximately 142 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Suzuki Forenza (178 Nm) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm). This means 2005 Suzuki Forenza will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Suzuki Forenza | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Suzuki | Triumph |
Model | Forenza | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 126 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 178 Nm | 158 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1312 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4570 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1510 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 64 L |