2005 Toyota Land Cruiser vs. 2012 Citroen C3
To start off, 2012 Citroen C3 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (232 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 2012 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser should accelerate faster than 2012 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser weights approximately 1209 kg more than 2012 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser (434 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Citroen C3. (133 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Citroen C3. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser has automatic transmission and 2012 Citroen C3 has manual transmission. 2012 Citroen C3 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota Land Cruiser | 2012 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Toyota | Citroen |
| Model | Land Cruiser | C3 |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4664 cc | 1360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 232 HP | 87 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3250 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Top Speed | 175 km/hour | 175 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.7 seconds | 14.5 seconds |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2335 kg | 1126 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3870 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1950 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2470 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 18.7 L/100km | 6.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 96 L | 45 L |
