2005 Toyota Matrix vs. 2011 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2011 Nissan Micra is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota Matrix. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota Matrix would be higher. At 1,793 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota Matrix (129 HP) has 50 more horse power than 2011 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Toyota Matrix (167 Nm) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2005 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Nissan Micra.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Toyota Matrix | 2011 Nissan Micra | |
| Make | Toyota | Nissan |
| Model | Matrix | Micra |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2011 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1793 cc | 1200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 129 HP | 79 HP |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 108 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1666 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1514 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2860 mm | 2449 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.1 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 46 L |
