2006 Acura CSX vs. 2008 Acura CSX
To start off, 2008 Acura CSX is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Acura CSX. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Acura CSX would be higher. Both 2006 Acura CSX and 2008 Acura CSX are equipped with a 2,000 cc engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 197 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Acura CSX | 2008 Acura CSX | |
| Make | Acura | Acura |
| Model | CSX | CSX |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2000 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 197 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1313 kg | 1313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4544 mm | 4544 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1752 mm | 1752 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1435 mm | 1435 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 6.8 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 10.2 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
