2006 Audi A6 vs. 2009 Lada 21
To start off, 2009 Lada 21 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi A6. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi A6 would be higher. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi A6 (253 HP) has 164 more horse power than 2009 Lada 21. (89 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 2009 Lada 21. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi A6 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2009 Lada 21. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Audi A6 (330 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Lada 21. (131 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2006 Audi A6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Lada 21.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi A6 | 2009 Lada 21 | |
Make | Audi | Lada |
Model | A6 | 21 |
Year Released | 2006 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 89 HP |
Torque | 330 Nm | 131 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3250 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1540 kg | 1115 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1470 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.7 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 70 L | 43 L |