2006 Audi S4 vs. 2013 Ferrari California
To start off, 2013 Ferrari California is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Audi S4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Audi S4 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Ferrari California weights approximately 431 kg more than 2006 Audi S4.
Because 2013 Ferrari California is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Ferrari California. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi S4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ferrari California (504 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Audi S4. (410 Nm). This means 2013 Ferrari California will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Audi S4.
Compare all specifications:
| 2006 Audi S4 | 2013 Ferrari California | |
| Make | Audi | Ferrari |
| Model | S4 | California |
| Year Released | 2006 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 410 Nm | 504 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1278 kg | 1709 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4562 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1902 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1308 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2660 mm | 2670 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 10.2 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 78 L |
