2006 Audi TT vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2006 Audi TT is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 5,766 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Audi TT (222 HP @ 5900 RPM) has 70 more horse power than 1968 Ford Fairlane. (152 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT should accelerate faster than 1968 Ford Fairlane. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Audi TT weights approximately 150 kg more than 1968 Ford Fairlane. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Audi TT is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1968 Ford Fairlane. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Audi TT will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2006 Audi TT | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | TT | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2006 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1779 cc | 5766 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 222 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5900 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1550 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4050 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1970 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1350 mm | 1040 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2960 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |